SM

 

HeadLice.Org Hot Spots
 
 

THE LOUSE

AN ACCOUNT OF THE LICE WHICH INFEST MAN, THEIR MEDICAL IMPORTANCE AND CONTROL

BY

PATRICK A. BUXTON, C.M.G., F.R.S.

DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY,
LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE
PROFESSOR OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF LONDON
FORMERLY FELLOW OF TRINITY COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE


LONDON: EDWARD-ARNOLD and CO.
First Published in 1939
Second Edition, 1947
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

  1. THE ANOPLURA OR SUCKING LICE
     
  2. THE ANATOMY OF PEDICULUS HUMANUS
     
  3. THE BIOLOGY OF PEDICULUS HUMANUS
    • Introductory
    • Individual Biology
      The egg
      The larva
      Position on host
      Dispersion, discovery and choice of host
      Feeding and nutrition
      Behaviour: sensory physiology
      Reproduction and egg laying
      Duration of life on host
      Causes of death
    • Collective Biology
      Powers of increase
      Constitution of a population of lice
      Distribution of lice in a human population
      Seasonal distribution
      Geographical distribution
      Relation to nutrition of host

     
  4. THE MEDICAL IMPORTANCE OF PEDICULUS HUMANUS
    • Man's Reactions
    • The Entomology of Typhus and Trench Fever
      Introductory
      Cycle of Rickettsia prowazeki in louse
      The cycle of Rickettsia muricola
      Epidemiology of murine and epidemic typhus
      Extracellular Rickettsia in Pediculus
    • The Entomology of Relapsing Fever
      Introductory
      Transmission by the louse
      Bed bug as vector
    • Epidemiology of relapsing fever carried by louse
    • Central African sleeping fever
    • Other tick-carried relapsing fevers

     
  5. THE CONTROL OF LICE
    • General considerations
    • Inspection
    • Contact insecticides
    • Fumigants
    • Other non-persistent methods
    • Destruction of eggs
    • Methods of application
    • Repellents
    • Protection of sanitary personnel
    • Publicity and information

     
  6. THE CRAB LOUSE (Phthirus pubis)
    • Anatomy
    • Biology
      The early stages
      The adult
    • Medical Importance
    • Control

     
  7. APPENDIX
    • Methods of rearing
    • Methods of feeding and infecting lice by rectal injection

     
  8. REEERENCES

     

    CHAPTER 1
    THE ANOPLURA OR SUCKING LICE

    1. Zoological Position

    The word "louse" has been applied to a great variety of insects, and indeed to other small animals, not closely related to one another but similar in being small and wingless. Even now, though the word is used in a much restricted sense, it is applied to two different groups of insects. The first of these are called the Biting Lice or Feather Lice (Mallophaga): these insects live on the skin of birds or mammals and have mouth parts fitted for biting solid substances. They feed on pieces of feather and fragments of scurf, and some of them also nibble the skin and take blood which exudes. We are not further concerned with them in this book. It is the so-called Sucking Lice (Anoplura) which are our subject. The Anoplura are a comprehensive group, in zoological language an Order. In technical terms the Anoplura might be defined as follows:

    Small, wingless insects flattened dorsiventrally. Antennae - short, 3-5 jointed. Eyes reduced or absent, and ocelli absent. Mouth parts highly modified for piercing and sucking blood of host; retracted within head when not in use. Palps absent. Thoracic segments fused together, without the least rudiment of wing. Legs short, tarsi with one joint and one claw: leg adapted for clinging to hair of host. Abdomen without cerci.

    Without metamorphosis, occurring on surface of host throughout life. Parasites of mammals exclusively.

    The sucking lice or Anoplura stand rather by themselves, not closely related to other orders of insects, except perhaps to the Mallophaga (the biting lice, or feather lice), already mentioned. The view was once held that the sucking lice were related to the bugs (Rhynchota), but this is known to be erroneous.

    The orders are in turn divided into "families", of which four are generally recognised in the Anoplura. Only one of these families, the Pediculidae, is of interest to ourselves, for it includes the lice which occur on man and monkeys: all members of this family possess eyes, a character which distinguishes them from all other Anoplura.

    To carry the matter further, the lice which occur on human beings, with which alone this work is concerned, are classified into two genera (Pediculus and Phthirus); in each genus there is only one species attacking man, viz. Pediculus humanus and Phthirus pubis. The first of these exists in two forms, the body louse and head louse; these are best regarded as biological races rather than species, because the anatomical distinctions between them are somewhat indefinite, though there are more pronounced differences in behaviour and biology (page 11). Phthirus pubis, or the crab louse, is generally confined to the inguinal region (page 138). These lice (both Pediculus humanus and Phthirus pubis) occur only on man and not on other hosts.

    It is held that the genera Pediculus and Phthirus are closely related: anatomical points which they have in common are an antenna consisting of five joints, the presence of pigmented eyes, and the fact that the tibia is provided with a process resembling a thumb, between which and the one-jointed tarsus the hair of the host is grasped.

    The points of distinction between the two genera of lice occurring on man are briefly as follows:

    Pediculus. All legs about equally strong (but anterior legs of male stouter than those of female). Abdomen about twice as long as it is broad. (See figure 1; pages 5 to 23.)

    Phthirus. Foreleg slender with long fine claw. Middle and hind legs strong with thick claws. Abdomen broader than long, and compressed so that spiracles of 3rd, 4th and 5th segments lie almost in one transverse line. Abdominal segments with protuberances at the side. (See figure 44; pages 136 to 141).

     

    2. General Biology

    All sucking lice (Anoplura) are obligate parasites, spending their whole life on the skin of a mammal and living exclusively on blood. Some 200 to 220 species of sucking lice are known. Though all the hosts are Mammalia there are certain important groups which have no parasites of this type; for instance, the Carnivora (exclusive of the dog family), and the Marsupials. A general account of the order is given by Ferris (I934).

    The Anoplura have, so far as is known, no insects which are parasitic upon them and probably very few enemies, except their hosts. They harbour certain parasitic micro-organisms, some at least of which (Spirochaeta and Rickettsia) are pathogenic to the mammalian hosts. For this reason human lice (Pediculus) have great importance as vectors of relapsing fever (page 90) and typhus (page 76).

    The relation of sucking louse to host is often very close, one species of louse living on one host, or on a few which are closely related to one another. In general it seems probable that this specificity is maintained by the parasite's reaction, which prevents it biting hosts other than the normal.

    Those who have studied the Anoplura, or lice, have found that those mammals which are closely related to one another tend to have closely related or identical lice. It seems that in the course of evolution the mammals have often come to differ from one another more than the lice, so that occasionally the insect parasite points to relationships between species of mammal which have become rather dissimilar. To take a very simple case, the Ground Squirrels (Citellus) of North America and Siberia are related but different, though the lice on them appear to be identical. A more complicated case is presented by the lice found on man and other Primates. The lice on these hosts all belong to one of the families (Pediculidae) into which the Anoplura are divided, and no member of that family occurs on any other host. On a conservative view, the family may be said to consist of three genera, Pedicinus, Pediculus and Phthirus. Of these, the first is found only on the monkeys of the Old World (Cynomorpha). Both Pediculus and Phthirus occur on man and higher apes, but not on other monkeys; Pediculus has species on two of the gibbons and on the chimpanzee (Fahrenholz); there is, however, some doubt as to whether the record from the gibbon is correct (Ewing, 1938). Phthirus includes a most imperfectly known species from the gorilla and has recently been recorded from the chimpanzee (Bedford, 1936): the records from gorilla and chimpanzee may be derived from menagerie material, and it is not conclusively known that these animals are natural hosts of the crab louse. The orang appears not to be infested with lice. Presumably, therefore, these two genera (Pediculus and Phthirus) have been parasites on the human stock, and its ancestors and close relatives, since very remote times. But in addition there are several species of Pediculus (sometimes separated and treated as an independent genus, Parapediculus) occurring only on monkeys in tropical America, particularly on Spider Monkeys (Ateles). The occurrence of these parasites (so close to man's louse) is puzzling, because on general anatomical grounds the American monkeys are far removed from man and his ancestry. It is possible that the lice found on spider monkeys may have been transferred to them from human beings, but if that occurred it was in the remote past, for considerable differences have been evolved between the parasite of man and spider monkey (Ewing, 1938).

    The examples quoted above illustrate the general truth that related hosts carry related parasites. There are, however, a few cases in which one must suppose that a species of louse has been transferred successfully and permanently to a completely new mammahan host.

     


     

    Updated 6 February, 1998
    Rick Speare

 

-- send this page to a friend --

The National Pediculosis Association,® Inc.
A Non-Profit Organization
Serving The Public Since 1983.

The National Pediculosis Association is a non-profit, tax exempt
organization that receives no government or agency funding.
Contributions are tax-deductible under the 501c(3) status.

© 1997-2009 The National Pediculosis Association®, Inc. All images © 1997-2009 The National Pediculosis Association®, Inc.