Shampooing with 
      Poison 
       
      From the NPA’s Progress newsletter, 
      Winter/Spring 1995 
       
      On January 12, 1995, the National Pediculosis Association issued yet 
      another alert to the public to avoid lindane-containing treatments for 
      individuals with lice or scabies. (Such infestations are endemic among the 
      American population, with estimates of as many as 1.2 million individuals 
      treated annually for lice alone.) Lindane, described by its original U.S. 
      manufacturer as a powerful contact and internal poison, is a known 
      neurotoxin widely prescribed for direct application to young children, 
      pregnant women, nursing mothers, and the elderly: Lindane is 99% pure 
      gammahexachlorocyclohexane - manufactured with the raw materials of 
      benzene and chlorine. In addition to its neurotoxic properties, lindane 
      has been associated with aplastic anemia, leukemia, and other blood 
      disorders.  
       
      A national reporting registry for lice and scabies related issues was 
      established by the NPA in May 1994, and has received reports of over 330 
      adverse reactions to various pesticidal lice and scabies product 
      treatments. Although the reactions have been reported by patients (or 
      their families) rather than physicians, their numbers and particulars are 
      sufficiently compelling to prompt additional serious concern about the 
      exposure to lindane. 
       
      Consistent among the most common adverse effects associated with exposure 
      to lindane and reported to the NPA's registry are illnesses including: 
      seizures, behavioral changes, neuromuscular complaints, attention deficit 
      disorders, chronic skin eruptions, and death. It was only when Ladies Home 
      Journal published an article on the subject in June of 1994 that people 
      first considered the possibility that their use of the chemical lindane 
      made them ill. In spite of the endemic state of lice and scabies, and 
      therefore the likelihood of subsequent exposure to potentially harmful 
      chemical treatments, physicians rarely inquire about such exposures when 
      taking routine medical histories. 
       
      NPA’s alert also goes out to residential .facilities where fear of a lice 
      or scabies outbreak often prompts indiscriminate applications of lindane 
      with little appreciation of the risks involved. This is especially 
      worrisome when one considers the hazards for individuals who receive (or 
      apply) multiple treatments. In 1994 a formal state investigation was 
      launched on behalf of individuals who died following lindane treatments in 
      a Kalamazoo, Michigan nursing home where it was mandated that everyone 
      receive lindane treatments in order to prevent an outbreak of scabies. 
       
      According to Solomon et al, (Archives of Dermatology 1990), given the 
      extremely narrow range of safety of this drug and the risk imposed by the 
      "kindling" effect, which potentiates convulsion seizures, and that this 
      potentiation may be carried on for a considerable period of time, there is 
      no good reason to use lindane in children or adults when other perfectly 
      effective, safer pediculicides are available. 
       
      While there are safer alternatives for treating lice and scabies 
      available, they too are pesticides and must be used with extreme caution. 
      (NPA and Centers for Disease Control urge everyone to avoid the use of 
      "environmental" lice sprays marketed for childrens' bedding and often 
      packaged in tandem with lice shampoos and lotions. These sprays are 
      unwarranted, and may pose personal and environmental hazards. Reports to 
      the NPA registry strongly indicate that such sprays maybe even more 
      haemful than earlier appreciated).  
       
      The FDA has received 137 possible adverse reactions to lindane reported 
      between 1976 (the date of its own lindane alert issued to the medical 
      community) and 1992. The difference between FDA's numbers and the over 330 
      reports to NPA in a much shorter period raises questions concerning 
      current reporting criteria and methods. The FDA's claim that insufficient 
      evidence exists to ban human exposure to lindane has been maintained in 
      the absence of controlled epidemiological studies on human exposure and 
      without an exposure registry or any research directed toward the 
      population most at risk; individuals who have lindane applied directly to 
      their bodies. The FDA, despite years of controversy over lindane's 
      potential toxic effects (especially to children), continues to call the 
      substance "safe and effective when used as directed." 
       
      None of the cases reported to the FDA were attributed to "proper use" of 
      lindane. One may be tempted to ascribe the NPA's much higher number of 
      reports to cases of improper usage, but, in fact, many of these reports to 
      the NPA involve cases in which lindane was used in accordance with 
      physicians' directives. In any event, the reports to the NPA indicate that 
      "improper use" is "normal use," for a large number of lindane users will 
      utilize the product contrary to its instructions.  
       
      On November 22, 1994, the National Pediculosis Association sent its first 
      volume of 330 adverse reaction reports to Dr. Sandy Kweder, Acting 
      Director of the Division of Epidemiology and Surveillance of the FDA. “I 
      encourage the NPA to seek serious scientific scrutiny to clarify the 
      relationship between potentially toxic pediculicides and scabicides and 
      the incidence of toxic reactions, whether immediate or delayed,” says John 
      C. Snyder, M.D., Professor of Population and Public Health, Emeritus, 
      Harvard School of Public Health. 
       
      According to Samuel Epstein, M.D., Director of the Chlcago-based Cancer 
      Prevention Coalition, from 1973 to 1991 the incidence rates of brain and 
      other nervous system cancers in children ages 0-14 have increased by 
      38.4%. His organization is joining a growing list of others calling upon 
      the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for an outright ban of lindane 
      based on what his group believes is sufficient evidence of lindane's 
      carcinogenicity. 
       
      It has been almost 15 years since Consumer's Union filed its original 
      petition to ban lindane. Too many have suffered as a result of FDA's lack 
      of resolve to protect the public from this dangerous chemical. Based on 
      important new evidence collected via the NPA's national reporting 
      registry, NPA is issuing this national alert to avoid all 
      lindane-containing products. 
       
      Commonly used brand names for lindane include among others: Kwell, Lindane 
      1%, Bio-Well, GBH, G-Well, Kwildane, Scabene, and Kwellada. | 
     
   
  
 
 |